26-cv-13138 | Levi's Parent Levi Strauss Sues: Denim Apparel Sellers Should Check
Levi Strauss & Co. filed a Schedule A case in the Northern District of Illinois on October 26, 2026.
| Case No. | 26-cv-13138 |
|---|---|
| Plaintiff / Brand | Levi Strauss & Co. |
| Plaintiff's Counsel | To be updated |
| Court | N.D. Illinois |
| Filed | October 26, 2026 |
| Status | Filed |
| IP Type | To be updated (complaint not yet public) |
Case overview
- Plaintiff: Levi Strauss & Co. (the parent company of the U.S. denim brand Levi’s)
- Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
- Filed: October 26, 2026
- Status: Filed. The plaintiff also filed a ‘Leave to File’ procedural document the same day, which in Schedule A cases is typically used to seek leave to file the defendant list and other materials under seal.
The complaint and Schedule A defendant list are not yet public; the rights and products at issue will be updated.
What may happen next
Schedule A plaintiffs usually move for a TRO within days of filing. Once granted, marketplaces freeze defendants’ funds.
Seller checklist
- Check titles and keywords for Levi’s, Levis, 501, and similar names or model numbers
- Watch for back-pocket arcuate stitching and red side tabs, design elements commonly covered by its registrations
- Check leather patches, buttons, and hang tags for its logos
Already frozen?
Keep the platform notice, emails from plaintiff’s counsel, affected listings, and sales records. Hold off on replying to the plaintiff or signing anything, and have counsel review the case. See: Store Frozen by a TRO: The First 72 Hours.
Sources
This alert is compiled from public court records for general information only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Case status may have changed; refer to the official court record.
Is your store in this case?
Send us the case number, your platform, and the frozen amount. We will review the case and explain your options.